Perhaps one of my more favorite researchers, Richard Hoagland, generally reserves his enormous energy and intellect on discussions of NASA, space travel and Mars. Imagine my waking to hear Richard going full bent in a discussion of the bee disappearance problem. He goes through a very thorough recounting of all suspect theories and then begins homing in on an entirely different notion. An aside note of interest is that in his research he found the organic and industrial beekeepers both jumped him about his, so far, outlandish theory. Bees and ants are our most robotic creatures, which is to say they do as instructed. The natural bee will from time to time readjust the size of the hive comb for various reason such as climate change, time of year and other factors. This in turn changes the size of the bee. For some years now (upwards to 200) beekeepers have been making starter kits which are basically an artificial platform to jump-start the honey comb development. The industrial guys found that they could produce more honey by making the platforms differently so that it produced bigger bees. Since the majority of honey is produced by the mega industry, we are (were) populated with the larger brand bees and the varying sizes were greatly diminished. Evidently the smaller type be readily attacks and kills the mites that some have attributed to the bee problem. These are readily seen piled up on the hive floor.
So one might think that our bee problem could perhaps be attributed to the greed of mega honey pots, but not so says Hoagland. Another aside here is that some time back I heard that Hoagland had spent some time down in Florida in the Coral Castle. He along with some other persistent folk refuse to believe that Leedskalnin pulled some cute little leverage tricks but was really on to something else. Leedskalnin was quite interested in astronomy and it seems that it was no accident, or at least of interest, that the material he worked with was coral that is made of geometric shapes much the same as honeycombs. Not so much that the bee solution begins in Florida but that these are two quite essential elements in Hoagland’s thesis… elements of the universe and geometry.
The geometry aspect I can get a bit of a hold on but when Hoagland gets out on the notions of either Torodial or Tubulin (I think the latter) he loses me. I have run across these terms in reading some of Robert Grace’s works but never took the time to figure these concepts out. (I have a small scrap of Grace’s monographs just part of many thousands… probably one of the most esoteric and enlightened minds around… completely disappeared) Hoagland somehow takes several of these elements, mixes them up with astronomical alignment (November of last year seems to be of importance) the positioning of the earth, ties this in with the aborted size of the honeycomb structure and maintains that this combo causes the bee to lose its navigation ability and those who drink know what that means.
What is more interesting is that Hoagland equates this stellar alignment with energy transfer and is working on a method to use this to guide space ships rather than firing rockets. He also stated, with some certainty that this is why cold fusion was having trouble replicating experiments in that this same alignment of energy that affects the bees operates on the cold fusion.
This whole process is more complicated than I can explain and I mention Grace because he used the same terminology and was highly involved in mathematics and esoteric physics as is obviously Hoagland. Both of these guys refer to certain numbers as being of prime significance in their process development (the number of the Golden Mean and 95.1?…)
One thing he did not bring up was the experiments of Grebennikov’s who found certain wasp’s nest made of cells that when cut apart and glued to a surface were capable of moving that surface up or down. This was attributed to the geometric configuration combined with other esoteric principles and like Leedskalnin was not prone to giving up the secrets of their discovery. Hoagland would likely tie in one of his space directed energy beams to further confuse the issue. However, when one moves this thought pattern down the line a bit, you can see that the geometric shapes seem to be or could be nothing more than receptors of either energy or instruction. Guy Murchie, in his book, The Seven Mysteries of Life, at one point breaks down the basic elements of life itself to symbols (geometric forms). Now if one would accept the notion that the word or a word is no more than a symbol, then some sense may be made out of the quote, “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was God and the Word was with God”. (close)
So now you are faced with the problem that your high school geometry teacher was god.
It is not so much that one should take all of this as being absolute, it is more that a pattern is being found here that comes from a strong linage of respected and sometimes esoteric minds, but seems to be more and more verified as we delve into the minutiae of science. When exploring forms of energy it appears that when one thinks more along the line of fusion and alignment rather than fission and combustion, it could be, in a sense, going more with the flow of the universe.
The bee problem is serious and needs to be solved or our world is in deep trouble soon. But I really never thought that an exploration into this problem would relate to energy ideas.
Yours for the thinking,
Wade
Some additional reading is available.
0 comments:
Post a Comment